Wow! This is truly great

The link the other day to Hannity, I just discovered, wasn't to Hannity at all. It was a link to Candy's "Hubby's" comment on Hannity's blog. Then she goes off and gives us another link to the exact same comment, but in so called "book form." Wow, what a wonderful cornucopia of ideas that flows out of Candy's household. I mean change it up a little. Does this response stay on her "hubby's" paste, just waiting to click away? This is one of the most ridiculous arguments ever. The founding fathers did not believe democracies were evil. They, with great merit considering Candy and her husband, thought people were stupid, and incapable of making decisions without the help of the wealthy and elite. That is why we are a Republic that has democratic principles. I can't tell from this "democracies are evil, and I am going to give you a very inaccurate government lesson" to jumping to welfare. I mean is this the worst travesty of justice out there. How about skirts Candy, or unbehaved children? Isn't there a greater need for penance than welfare? Erik goes on to say "
When the Rights of each
individual are respected, the Rights of society, as a whole, are
automatically taken care of – Justice for all, but it doesn’t work
the other way around. It also will not work if the Representatives
are not held to their oath." So the other way around would be all for justice. I don't understand, and I am positive that Erik doesn't either.
I mean Erik starts off by saying how dumb Americans are, and then goes on to say that these dumb people should be afforded all of the power. I think that was the point of our fore fathers, there dumb ass. He speaks in circles, but so do most ignorant and delusional people. You are not placed into servitude for paying taxes that purchase a hell of a lot more than just welfare. As a matter of fact, WAR is using five times the amount of money per dollar as welfare. Schools, roads, police, homeland security, the F.B.I., and FEMA are all examples of money that people are happily willing to go into servitude for.
The best line in the comment is "
When a Socialist starts using the term
'Social Justice', they are referring to Socialism". Really there Dick Tracy when a socialist starts talking about politics more times than not they are referring to Socialism. Could that be the same as when a Capitalist, Communist, or Libertarian talks about government, that they are more than likely talking about their particular view on government. It is kind of like when your wife opens her mouth or taps her fingers it is going to be about something related to religion, something offensive, or some dumb take on politics.